Written By: Albert Schweitzer
Translated By: A. J. Mattill, Jr.
Reviewed English Edition: Mercer University Press, 1982
Originally Published As:
Das Abendmahlsproblem auf Grund der wissenschaftlichen Forschung des 19. Jahrhunderts und der historischen Berichte, Heft 1: Das Abendmahl im Zusammenhang mit dem Leben Jesu und der Geschichte des Urchristentums, 1901
Hardcover, 144 pages
ISBN 086554025X
Quotes
Table of Contents
Laymen and laywomen may be forgiven for being surprised to find that there is a problem with the Lord's Supper (that is, the eucharist). After all, the blessing and consumption of bread and wine has been celebrated in Christian churches since the founding of Christianity. However, scholars have known for centuries that there are in fact a number of peculiarities and apparent inconsistencies in New Testament accounts of the Lord's Supper. To simplify one particular concern, the blessings and consumptions appear in different orders: the bread is blessed and then consumed, while the wine is consumed and then blessed. It may seem a trivial difference, but it raises important questions that, at least until recently, sharply divided churches and, indeed, individual scholars within various traditions. In particular, did (and does) the blessing confer redemption, or did (and does) the significance of the Lord's Supper rely on the actual consumption? Or was it all intended as figurative, with the real significance lying in the disciples increased understanding of Messiahship and the Kingdom?
The answers to these and other questions seem to differ in various Gospels, and, importantly, the early Christian tradition of the eucharist departs substantially from most Gospel accounts. Schweitzer resolves these problems by accepting Mark's Gospel as the most historically reliable account within the Gospels, and emphasizing the eschatological features of Mark's (and other) accounts. Since the world did not immediately end, early Christians would have had to de-emphasize eschatological meaning and develop new understandings. Paul, in particular, developed a theologically complex and internally consistent understanding of Christ's work on Earth and a person's proper relationship to Christ. However, Schweitzer only hints at his solution in this book. A fuller explanation had to wait until his books The Mystery of the Kingdom of God and The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle, among other works. Therefore The Problem of the Lord's Supper is not a fully satisfying book, but does point the way to Schweitzer's later works, both with respect to approach and theology.
[From the introduction by John Reumann] "We conclude with a paradox. Schweitzer's work on the Lord's Supper has left little mark from its survey of research, none in practical worship life in Strassburg or elsewhere, and had a mixed reception at best in the history of interpreation of the Lord's Supper texts. Yet what he emphasized--the church's meal as an eschatological feast, a foretaste of one to come in the kingdom; the mood of "holy hilarity," as in Acts 1-2; de-emphasis of the cross and death of Jesus; of confession of sins, and Good-Friday piety, and even of the words of institution, which have been replaced by, or incorporated into, a "eucharistic prayer"--all that has simply become commonplace in much recent liturgy-making, post-Vatican II Roman Catholic, Anglican, Lutheran, even Presbyterian-Reformed and Free Church. How did that come about?"
[note: By 'the primitive Christian celebration', Schweitzer means the eucharist celebration as it was following the crucification of Jesus; by 'the historical celebration' he mean the eucharist celebration as described in the synoptic Gospels, especially Mark.] "The interpretations with a one-sided emphasis upon the moment of partaking can explain only the primitive Christian celebration, never the historical celebration.
The interpretations with a one-sided emphasis upon the moment of presentation can explain only the historical celebration, never the primitive Christian celebration.
The two-sided interpretations can explain the historical celebration only to the extent that they do not explain the primitive Christian celebration, and vice versa.
"Now it is the peculiarity of all modern historical interpretations of the Lord's Supper that they do not stress the eschatological thought in the celebration. They do not utitize the saying about drinking the new wine in the Father's kingdom as a statement which constitutes the essence of the final meal, but at the most they make out of it a supplementary saying."
"The problem of the Lord's Supper is the problem of the life of Jesus! A new interpretation of the Lord's Supper can be built only upon a new interpretation of the life of Jesus, an interpretation which so contains the secrets of the messiahship and of the passion that his solemn action at the final meal becomes comprehensible and understandable. A new life of Jesus: that is the only way to the solution of the problem of the Lord's Supper."
Editor's Preface Introduction, by John ReumannBibliography of Works Mentioned in the Introduction or Important for the Subject The Problem of the Lord's Supper: Volume I Preface to a New Investigation of the Lord's Supper Part One: The Problem of the Lord's Supper according to Scholarly Research of the Nineteenth Century Chapter I: Introduction
- The Context in Schweitzer's Career
- Schweitzer's Life
- The Work of Schweitzer as New Testament Scholar
- Beginning on the Lord's Supper
- Schweitzer's Plan and Publications
- Carrying Through on Jesus and Paul
- The Contents of Schweitzer's 1901 Volume 1
- The Results
- The Exegesis and Assumptions
- The Historical Summary
- Assessing Schweitzer's Achievements
- Methodology and Results
- New Testament Findings
- Practical and Ecumenical Results
Chapter II: The Prelude: Zwingli and Calvin Chapter III: The Two-Sided Interpretations Which Take the Moment of Presentation as Their Basis and Grant a Secondary Importance to the Moment of Partaking
- Skepticism in the Research on the Lord's Supper
- The Starting Point
- The Individual Questions
- The Four Types of Interpretations of the Lord's Supper
Chapter IV: Survey of the Interpretations Which Take the Moment of Partaking as Their Basis Chapter V: The Interpretations with a One-Sided Development of the Moment of Partaking
- The First Half of the the Nineteenth Century: De Wette, Ebrard, and Ruckert
- The Second Half of the Nineteenth Century: Th. Keim, K. v. Weizsacker, W. Beyschlag, H. Holtzmann, P. Lobstein, W. Schmiedel
Chapter VI: The Two-Sided Interpretations Which Take the Moment of Partaking as Their Basis and Grant a Secondary Importance to the Moment of Presentation: Ad. Harnack, Erich Haupt, Fr. Schultzen
- The Early Period: Fr. Strauss, Bruno Bauer, E. Renan
- The Modern Attempts: W. Brandt, Fr. Spitta, A. Eichhorn
- W. Brandt
- Fr. Spitta
- Criticism of Spitta's Interpretation
- A. Eichhorn
- The New "Fact"
- Skepticism as the Result eof the One-Sided Development of the Moment of Partaking
- The Logical Ground of Skepticism
Chapter VII: The Connection between the Individual Questions and the Laws Which Govern It
- General
- Ad. Harnack
- Erich Haupt
- Fr. Schultzen
- R. A. Hoffman
Chapter VIII: The Intrepretations with a One-Sided Stress upon the Moment of Presentation
- The Command of Repetition
- The Lord's Supper and hte Primitive Christian Congregation Meal
- The Antimony between the Historical and the Primitive Christian Celebrations
Chapter IX: The New Formulation of the Problem
- The Field of Battle
- The Defense Plan: P. W. Schmiedel
- The Offensive: Adolf Julicher
- Skepticism in the Interpretations with a One-Sided Stress upon the Moment of Presentation
- The Result of the Investigation
- The New Way
Part Two: The Problem of the Lord's Supper according to the Historical Accounts Manuscripts and Ancient Versions (Editor's Note) Chapter X: The Questions Raised by Textual CriticismChapter XI: The Peculiarity of the Marcan Account (Mark 14:22-26) Chpater XII: The Comparison of the Accounts
- Codex D. The Chief Question Raised by Textual Criticism
- Variant Readings
- The Result of Textual Criticism
Chapter XIII: The Authenticity of the Marcan Account
- The Principle of Harmonization
- The Matthean Account (Matthew 26:26-29)
- The Pauline Account (1 Corinthians 11:23-26)
- The Lucan Account (Luke 22:14-20)
- The Justinian Account (1 Apologia 66)
Indexes Persons Texts
- The Proof
- The Consequences of the Authenticity of the Marcan Account
- The Secrets of the Messiahship and of the Passion in the Lord's Supper
Click here to return to the Albert Schweitzer Page.